My vote is for D - TrustSec. Yes, ISE can automate, but TrustSec uses Contextual Identification to simplify the securing of network resources by using SGTs. For example, you can tag a server with the "HR" SGT. With that, TrustSec will only allow users/endpoints with the same HR SGT to access that server, and blocking any other endpoints from accessing it. Option C starts getting a bit too complicated by mentioning RADIUS AV pairs, but the TrustSec option seemed pretty clear-cut.

Answer is (C) Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) automates network access control by leveraging RADIUS Attribute-Value (AV) pairs.

I go with C. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/identity-services-engine/215525-use-radius-for-device-administration-wit.html

I go with C.

the solution that specifically emphasizes the automation and central management of network access control, leveraging RADIUS attributes (AV pairs), is Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE). ISE not only simplifies secure access management but also integrates well with existing network infrastructure to provide comprehensive access control and policy enforcement. Therefore, while TrustSec (D) is an important solution for managing secure access through logical grouping and policy assignment, the best answer in terms of simplifying management specifically through automation and leveraging RADIUS AV pairs is C

ISE is the correct answer. The secure access in cisco is ISE.

ISE is the Answer. The description of the device is a NAC -> ISE

The answer is D

The answer is D. From 31 days before CCNP, page 524: Cisco TrustSec simplifies the provisioning and management of secure access to network services and applications.

C is correct. according to following link. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/2-4/admin_guide/b_ISE_admin_guide_24/m_introduction.html#:~:text=Cisco%20Identity%20Services%20Engine%20(ISE,network%20device%20administration%20for%20enterprises.

I think - D...